Close Menu
Daily Guardian EuropeDaily Guardian Europe
  • Home
  • Europe
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Travel
  • Environment
  • Culture
  • Press Release
  • Trending
What's On

How Portugal shaped Canada’s new submarines and fine-tuned Arctic defence

April 23, 2026

Trump envoy calls on FIFA to replace Iran with Italy at World Cup

April 23, 2026

Iran war effects on Europe: Is a recession already unfolding?

April 23, 2026

These are the top destinations in Europe for a last-minute trip

April 23, 2026

Why are there protests over plan to send Frida Kahlo masterpieces to Spain?

April 23, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Web Stories
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Daily Guardian Europe
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Europe
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Travel
  • Environment
  • Culture
  • Press Release
  • Trending
Daily Guardian EuropeDaily Guardian Europe
Home»Europe
Europe

Russian Central Bank sues EU for immobilising €210 billion in assets

By staffMarch 3, 20263 Mins Read
Russian Central Bank sues EU for immobilising €210 billion in assets
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Published on
03/03/2026 – 10:07 GMT+1

The Russian Central Bank has filed a lawsuit against the European Union for the indefinite immobilisation of its sovereign assets, which the bloc approved last year in a bid to strengthen its leverage in ongoing talks to end the war in Ukraine and prevent Moscow from tapping into the funds for its own profit.

The assets are worth about €210 billion, with €185 billion, held at Euroclear, a Brussels-based depository already sued by Moscow.

The legal action was submitted to the EU’s General Court in Luxembourg on 27 February, but it was announced on Tuesday morning in a short press release.

The bank alleges that the long-term immobilisation “violates the basic and inalienable rights to access justice, inviolability of property, and the principle of sovereign immunity of States and their central banks, guaranteed by international treaties and European Union law, which contradicts the fundamentals of the rule of law and cannot be regarded as compatible with the principle of supremacy of law”, the statement said.

The regulation that is being challenged was agreed by member states in December amid intense negotiations to provide Ukraine with €90 billion in fresh assistance.

The long-term immobilisation was implemented under Article 122 of the EU Treaties. The provision has been used in past economic emergencies, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the energy crisis, and requires a qualified majority.

In a novel interpretation, the European Commission argued that the shockwaves unleashed by Russia’s war have caused a “serious economic impact” for the EU as a whole, triggering “serious supply disruptions, higher uncertainty, increased risk premia, lower investment and consumer spending”, in addition to countless hybrid attacks in the form of drone incursions, sabotage and disinformation campaigns.

Under the ban, the €210 billion will be released only after Russia meets three conditions: it ceases its war of aggression, provides reparations to Ukraine and no longer poses a “serious risk of severe difficulties” to the European economy.

Given that Moscow has categorically ruled out compensating Kyiv, it is unlikely the money will ever be set free.

“We are sending a strong signal to Russia that as long as this brutal war of aggression continues, Russia’s costs will continue to rise,” Ursula von der Leyen said in December. “This is a powerful message to Ukraine: We want to make sure that our brave neighbour becomes even stronger on the battlefield and at the negotiating table.”

The Russian Central Bank claims Brussels “committed serious procedural violations” by using a qualified majority under Article 122 rather than the unanimity that governs foreign policy. Hungary, an opponent to Ukraine aid, voiced similar complaints in December.

The Commission did not immediately reply to the new lawsuit. After Moscow sued Euroclear, it dismissed the legal action as “speculative” and groundless.

The regulation currently in place forbids the recognition and execution within the bloc of any claim made “in connection” with the immobilisation of the Russian assets.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Keep Reading

How Portugal shaped Canada’s new submarines and fine-tuned Arctic defence

Latvian defence minister has ‘no doubt’ US would aid NATO allies if needed

Winning Hungary’s election hasn’t stopped false claims about Péter Magyar

Adapt or lose: Ukraine’s drone war is exposing Europe’s weakness

‘Recovery could take years’: EU energy commissioner forecasts future energy pain

Europe Today: Ukraine loan set to be unlocked as EU moves to curb energy crisis

Newsletter: EU leaders weigh a NATO-style common defence clause

Deepfakes of frontline Ukrainian soldiers aim to undermine morale

‘Learn from Ukraine or defence money will be wasted,’ Sanna Marin warns EU

Editors Picks

Trump envoy calls on FIFA to replace Iran with Italy at World Cup

April 23, 2026

Iran war effects on Europe: Is a recession already unfolding?

April 23, 2026

These are the top destinations in Europe for a last-minute trip

April 23, 2026

Why are there protests over plan to send Frida Kahlo masterpieces to Spain?

April 23, 2026

Subscribe to News

Get the latest Europe and world news and updates directly to your inbox.

Latest News

Comment les Verts britanniques veulent purger leur programme pour mieux gagner – POLITICO

April 23, 2026

Latvian defence minister has ‘no doubt’ US would aid NATO allies if needed

April 23, 2026

US Navy Secretary John Phelan leaves post amid Iran war in latest Pentagon shake-up

April 23, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest TikTok Instagram
© 2026 Daily Guardian Europe. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.