Close Menu
Daily Guardian EuropeDaily Guardian Europe
  • Home
  • Europe
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Travel
  • Environment
  • Culture
  • Press Release
  • Trending
What's On

Merz und Trump – das Ende der Bromance – POLITICO

April 1, 2026

Europe hardens opposition to Trump’s Iran war demands – POLITICO

April 1, 2026

Trump says Iran war could end in ‘two weeks’, with or without deal

April 1, 2026

How bad will Europe’s energy crisis get? – POLITICO

April 1, 2026

Why Viktor Orbán is so hard to beat – POLITICO

April 1, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Web Stories
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Daily Guardian Europe
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Europe
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Travel
  • Environment
  • Culture
  • Press Release
  • Trending
Daily Guardian EuropeDaily Guardian Europe
Home»Europe
Europe

Russian Central Bank sues EU for immobilising €210 billion in assets

By staffMarch 3, 20263 Mins Read
Russian Central Bank sues EU for immobilising €210 billion in assets
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Published on
03/03/2026 – 10:07 GMT+1

The Russian Central Bank has filed a lawsuit against the European Union for the indefinite immobilisation of its sovereign assets, which the bloc approved last year in a bid to strengthen its leverage in ongoing talks to end the war in Ukraine and prevent Moscow from tapping into the funds for its own profit.

The assets are worth about €210 billion, with €185 billion, held at Euroclear, a Brussels-based depository already sued by Moscow.

The legal action was submitted to the EU’s General Court in Luxembourg on 27 February, but it was announced on Tuesday morning in a short press release.

The bank alleges that the long-term immobilisation “violates the basic and inalienable rights to access justice, inviolability of property, and the principle of sovereign immunity of States and their central banks, guaranteed by international treaties and European Union law, which contradicts the fundamentals of the rule of law and cannot be regarded as compatible with the principle of supremacy of law”, the statement said.

The regulation that is being challenged was agreed by member states in December amid intense negotiations to provide Ukraine with €90 billion in fresh assistance.

The long-term immobilisation was implemented under Article 122 of the EU Treaties. The provision has been used in past economic emergencies, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the energy crisis, and requires a qualified majority.

In a novel interpretation, the European Commission argued that the shockwaves unleashed by Russia’s war have caused a “serious economic impact” for the EU as a whole, triggering “serious supply disruptions, higher uncertainty, increased risk premia, lower investment and consumer spending”, in addition to countless hybrid attacks in the form of drone incursions, sabotage and disinformation campaigns.

Under the ban, the €210 billion will be released only after Russia meets three conditions: it ceases its war of aggression, provides reparations to Ukraine and no longer poses a “serious risk of severe difficulties” to the European economy.

Given that Moscow has categorically ruled out compensating Kyiv, it is unlikely the money will ever be set free.

“We are sending a strong signal to Russia that as long as this brutal war of aggression continues, Russia’s costs will continue to rise,” Ursula von der Leyen said in December. “This is a powerful message to Ukraine: We want to make sure that our brave neighbour becomes even stronger on the battlefield and at the negotiating table.”

The Russian Central Bank claims Brussels “committed serious procedural violations” by using a qualified majority under Article 122 rather than the unanimity that governs foreign policy. Hungary, an opponent to Ukraine aid, voiced similar complaints in December.

The Commission did not immediately reply to the new lawsuit. After Moscow sued Euroclear, it dismissed the legal action as “speculative” and groundless.

The regulation currently in place forbids the recognition and execution within the bloc of any claim made “in connection” with the immobilisation of the Russian assets.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Keep Reading

Kallas insists Russian assets are an option if Orbán doesn’t lift veto on Ukraine loan

US wrong to negotiate, Iranian regime “not trustworthy”: Iranian opposition leader

EU countries, except Hungary, vow ‘full accountability’ for war crimes in Ukraine

Fact check: Does Hungary have alternatives to the Druzhba pipeline?

Lebanese minister speaks to Euronews as Israeli strikes leave 1,200 dead in Lebanon

Newsletter: Lebanese minister says situation ‘dramatic’ as Israel expands ground invasion

The unanimity trap: what is the EU veto and why is it so hard to reform?

Ukraine signs 10-year defence deal with arms producer Bulgaria, Zelenskyy says

Hungary’s upcoming election and the effects of the generation gap

Editors Picks

Europe hardens opposition to Trump’s Iran war demands – POLITICO

April 1, 2026

Trump says Iran war could end in ‘two weeks’, with or without deal

April 1, 2026

How bad will Europe’s energy crisis get? – POLITICO

April 1, 2026

Why Viktor Orbán is so hard to beat – POLITICO

April 1, 2026

Subscribe to News

Get the latest Europe and world news and updates directly to your inbox.

Latest News

Top Brussels official urges Europeans to work from home and drive less – POLITICO

April 1, 2026

Europäer sollen von zu Hause arbeiten – POLITICO

April 1, 2026

EU diplomats meet in Ukraine to pledge support for Russia war crimes tribunal – POLITICO

March 31, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest TikTok Instagram
© 2026 Daily Guardian Europe. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.