Close Menu
Daily Guardian EuropeDaily Guardian Europe
  • Home
  • Europe
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Travel
  • Environment
  • Culture
  • Press Release
  • Trending
What's On

UK approves its second weight-loss pill while EU access lags – POLITICO

August 10, 2026

Danube water level rising: Another Paks nuclear plant turbine may restart

August 10, 2026

Video. Firefighters battle wildfire in eastern Spain’s Castellón

August 10, 2026

From Tuscany to Moldova: The best winery restaurants in Europe revealed

August 10, 2026

Moldovan president condemns Russia over killer drone crash – POLITICO

August 10, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Web Stories
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Daily Guardian Europe
Newsletter
  • Home
  • Europe
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Travel
  • Environment
  • Culture
  • Press Release
  • Trending
Daily Guardian EuropeDaily Guardian Europe
Home»World
World

Iran and Oman agree route for ships in Strait of Hormuz, Tehran says

By staffAugust 5, 20263 Mins Read
Iran and Oman agree route for ships in Strait of Hormuz, Tehran says
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Iran and Oman on Wednesday finalised an agreement on what Tehran calls the geographical coordinates of a proposed shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said Iran and Oman are preparing a joint statement on the agreement which includes technical, legal, security and environmental points.

Separately, Iranian media quoted official sources saying that the reopening of the Strait would depend on the US ending its naval blockade of the country’s ports.

The key aspect of such an agreement revolves around Tehran’s insistence to charge fees for passage as it claims sovereign control of the key waterway, in direct opposition with the United States and the Gulf countries who insist that navigation must remain free as stipulated by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.

“Provided that certain third parties do not obstruct the process, a joint statement by the two countries outlining the main considerations and points agreed upon is also being reviewed and finalized,” Baghaei said referring to the US as a “third party”.

Baghaei however underlined that the Iran-Oman agreement in itself cannot guarantee the safety of navigation through Hormuz as long as “the US naval blockade and other actions against Iran and its interests remain in place.”

Tehran’s announcement comes amid several days of intense speculation on the two-month long negotiations between Iran and Oman, which Tehran insists are in line with the Memorandum of Understanding signed with the United States in June.

Contradictory comments on US-Iran talks

Earlier on Wednesday, Iranian state television reported that the Iran-Oman talks focus on setting up a “middle corridor” through the Strait of Hormuz, to be controlled by the two countries.

Another Iranian state media outlet reported that the agreement would not immediately result in the reopening of the strait due to what Tehran calls “US violations”, and that the negotiations “have nothing to do with the United States”.

“The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz depends on a change in US behaviour and the correction of its violations,” state TV channel IRIB said.

However, US President Donald Trump insisted in an interview with US broadcaster Fox News on Tuesday night that the US is part of the Hormuz negotiations, which are “moving along very nicely”.

“The Strait is going to be open very soon, or they are going to get hit very hard, and then the strait is going to be open,” Trump said.

The waterway, a crucial energy transit chokepoint that carries roughly a quarter of the global seaborne oil trade, was effectively closed by Iran after US and Israeli strikes in late February, sparking wild swings in energy markets.

Former head of Israel’s military intelligence research department Danny Citrinowicz commented on X that “from day one, it was clear that restoring the Strait of Hormuz to its pre-crisis status would have required either regime change in Iran or a sustained military effort to impose control over the waterway.”

“Neither option was politically or strategically acceptable to Washington, given the enormous costs and long-term commitments they would require. Sometimes, the least desirable option is the only realistic one,” Citrinowicz said.

Additional sources • AFP

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Keep Reading

Video. Firefighters battle wildfire in eastern Spain’s Castellón

Saudi factory fire kills 16 Bangladeshis, Dhaka announces

Powerful 6.6-magnitude quake rocks Colombia, geological agency says

Days of heavy rain leave at least 13 dead in Philippines, rescuers say

Video. Hundreds join Copenhagen kayak parade in support of Greenland

Video. Latest news bulletin | August 10th, 2026 – Midday

The Invisible Primary: Inside the Democratic Party’s Shadow Campaign for 2028

Comic Con Astana brings global stars and thousands of cosplay fans to Kazakhstan

Western Europe sets new temperature record as heat waves continue to pummel region

Editors Picks

Danube water level rising: Another Paks nuclear plant turbine may restart

August 10, 2026

Video. Firefighters battle wildfire in eastern Spain’s Castellón

August 10, 2026

From Tuscany to Moldova: The best winery restaurants in Europe revealed

August 10, 2026

Moldovan president condemns Russia over killer drone crash – POLITICO

August 10, 2026

Subscribe to News

Get the latest Europe and world news and updates directly to your inbox.

Latest News

Firefighters struggle to put out three wildfires in southwestern Spain

August 10, 2026

Saudi factory fire kills 16 Bangladeshis, Dhaka announces

August 10, 2026

Inside the Italian prison where inmates find freedom through theatre

August 10, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest TikTok Instagram
© 2026 Daily Guardian Europe. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.