The amount of land ravaged in Portugal’s recent devastating wildfires is estimated to cover 122,000 hectares. Around 83% of the land is located in the north and centre of the country.
Wildfires have been raging in central and northern Portugal since 15 September, claiming at least five lives and injuring 182.
The government decreed a day of national mourning on Friday to honour the victims of the fires.
An estimated 122,380 hectares worth of land has burned in the blazes, according to the Portuguese Nature Conservation and Forestry Institute (ICNF).
From this estimation, 60% was forest stands, 29% scrub forests and 11% agricultural crops.
In Europe, Portugal is among the countries hardest hit by wildfires in recent years.
Experts claim the recent disaster has been caused by a combination of strong winds, climate change bringing higher temperatures than usual for the late summer (exceeding 30ºC) and very low humidity.
However, they warn that a lack of biodiversity in Portuguese forests and a rising depopulation of these areas are the biggest factors that contribute to extreme wildfires.
“We’re heading towards a very worrying situation in terms of climate change, in which these very critical conditions that we’ve had are going to happen more and more,” Maria Conceição Caldeira, ForEco researcher and coordinator said. “We really need to have a very adapted landscape.”
Former Portuguese Green MEP Francisco Guerreiro is among the most vocal politicians in calling out for more biodiversity in this country’s forests: “What is missing in Portuguese forests is biodiversity and responsible long-term management. We need more and better forests.”
A need for a more diverse forest landscape
Portugal’s forest area is made up of 26% eucalyptus; cluster pine and cork oak (23% each); and holm oak (11%) trees, according to the ICNF.
Researchers do not consider these four tree species varied enough to prevent the rapid spread of wildfires.
“There is no tree species that will stop from wildfires happening,” Conceição Caldeira said. “There is also no tree species which will determine whether the fire will be more intense or not.”
Yet, a combination of species along the landscape will help the country to avoid intense wildfires. This is because some grow longer than others and may respond differently to fires.
With the effects of the deadly wildfires of June 2017 still present, forest management has again come under scrutiny.
Many locals have also been pointing fingers at the abusive use of eucalyptus in Portuguese forests.
Climate groups Climáximo and Emergência Florestal are organising demonstrations across Portugal on 22 September to protest against the apparent inaction in preventing forest fires.
Why is the eucalyptus getting the blame?
Despite the eucalyptus being native to south-eastern Australia, the tree species covers 1.3 million hectares of forested area in Europe, according to the European Atlas of Forest Tree Species.
More than 80% of this area is in the Iberian Peninsula, with Italy and France coming next.
As wildfires become more common each summer, researchers say they understand the anger towards the eucalyptus.
“The association with the wildfires is natural,” Domingos Xavier Viegas, director of the Centre for Forest Fire Research (CEIF), said. “The eucalyptus is becoming the dominant species in our forests more and more.”
The eucalyptus is the tallest tree species recorded in Europe as it can grow up to 70 metres, so fires in eucalyptus plantations tend to be very dangerous.
“They release a lot of energy and particles that can cause projections from centres that are very difficult to control,” Xavier Viegas said. “Eucalyptus trees can produce secondary outbreaks, to release particles that can be projected over great distances and give rise to new fires.”
However, experts highlight that the tree is a source of income for the inhabitants of northern and central Portugal, as it is widely used for industrial purposes, mainly as paper pulp, firewood and timber.
“Eucalyptus is a fast-growing species. So in 12 years, you have a mature tree,” Conceição Caldeira said. “That’s not the case with most of the trees we have, so it does have an important economic return for people and it has to be seen as that.”
